Friday, September 28, 2007

Purdue v. UND (Weekly Prognostication)

With the game just under 24 hours away, it's time to put our predictions down in writing. While I seem to have the most apprehension about this year's game versus Notre Dame, we all are in agreement about the outcome...Here goes:

Tim says:

"In typical fashion for me, I'm worried about this game. I think Purdue SHOULD destroy the Cryrish, but there's a nagging fear in the back of my head. For now, I will ignore that fear and predict a true ass whooping...

"I predict that Mike Alstott will have 357 yards rushing, Taylor Stubblefield will have 233 yards receiving, Vinny Sutherland with have not one, not two, but three kick \ punt returns for touchdowns. John Reeves will throw for 200 yards in the first quarter, but will go down with turf toe. Billy Dicken will come in and continue the onslaught.

"That is all. I have spoken."

So, while I'm not sure what Tim was drinking while making this prediction, here's his final score:
Purdue 66
UND 20

J Says:

I see the Boilers coming out of the gate extremely focused because I do also believe that Tiller takes ND seriously. Sure, this team has major focus problems and always has under Joe, but one game they almost always seem awake for is the matchup with the Irish. And in recent years, it's finally become a good series. After many, many years of bad losses and worse losses, the Boilers began to fight back about ten years ago. In Tiller's tenure, the Boilers are 4-6 against the Irish and were 4-4 at one point. In 2004, they won for the first time AT South Bend in thirty years. However, the past two years, Purdue has been solidly outplayed by Charlie's crew. The frustrating thing is that I don't think Notre Dame was as better as the score indicated in those games -- I think it was a combo of them being good and well-prepared and the Boilers simply not playing well. Not an excuse, but I just think those games should have been closer. This year, there's no doubt we should win. None at all. I can't imagine Purdue's been a 22-point favorite over the Domers in a very, very long time. I would suspect we're talking nearly 40 years. So with that comes the very unusual expectation of this being a walkover. 22 points? Winning by more than three touchdowns? While it makes sense when you look at it objectively on paper, most Purdue loyalists like us just cannot imagine seeing that happen (despite the ass-whipping we put on them in 2004). But regardless, let me get to the point: As I said, I think Purdue will come out very focused and take a lead in the first quarter. I think the game will play out a lot like the game ND just played against MSU -- that is, the Irish will get back into it in the second quarter and make it a game. However, I have to have faith in our team because regardless of what anyone says, we DO have more talent and a team that's scoring at will these days. Not many games mean as much to us to win as the annual Notre Dame game. 22 points? Okay, I'll take it."

Purdue 42
UND 20

Boilerdowd says:

It's a good thing I don't play for Purdue, for multiple reasons actually. First, where do you put a 5'4" 175 lb. player that runs an 8.0 second 40? Second, just thinking about the game gives me butterflies. I'm past my 32nd birthday, but this game makes me feel like I'm 10 years old as it conjures up memories of Purdue v. UND at the Hoosier Dome back in 1984 or Billy Dicken & Co. surprising everybody in 1997...Of course, Taylor Stubblefield giving the "choo choo" motion as he zips 90 plus yards down the sideline in South Bend. All that said, I also remember being railroaded by Lou's boys in cold rain, and having urine splattered on my elbow while sitting in the student's section at UND...Like J said, this one's as important to me, as a fan, as any other game on the schedule. I've been cautious all week, but here's my final prediction: 22 points are too many, I don't think I'd bet on my Boilers to cover (I don't bet on my alma mater, mind you)...that said, I think they'll win in a bit of a nail-biter:

Purdue 32
UND 21

    To Your Call Once More We Rally;
    Alma Mater Hear Our Praise.
    Where The Wabash Spreads Its Valley;
    Filled With Joy Our Voices Raise.
    From The Skies In Swelling Echoes
    Come The Cheers That Tell The Tale
    Of Your Vict'ries And Your Heros,
    Hail Purdue! We Sing All Hail!

Chorus:

    Hail, Hail To Old Purdue!
    All Hail To Our Old Gold And Black!
    Hail, Hail To Old Purdue!
    Our Friendship May She Never Lack.
    Ever Grateful, Ever True,
    Thus We Raise Our Song Anew;
    Of The Days We've Spent With You,
    All Hail Our Own Purdue!

(hopefully, Jimmy won't be smiling at the end of the day, Saturday...Jimmy doesn't like getting hit!)

9 comments:

Tim said...

My first statement is of the grammatically nitpicking kind.

J Money said "The frustrating thing is that I don't think Notre Dame was as better as the score indicated in those games."

I don't think they was as better either.

Also, I'm going to use a new war cry this weekend. "Come on Boilers! Let's get boring!" Meaning of course that we are up by so many points that we are bored by more scoring.

Anonymous said...

First, my ultimate nightmare. Thinking that running on Notre Dame is so easy a caveman could do it, Tiller gets the actual cavemen from Geico. Ross-Ade is burned down. Now, my nightmare (as mentioned previously!). Tiller thinks it's 2000, so the playbook consists of Sheets up the middle for 3 yards, Sheets to the right for 4 yards, Sheets. . fumble. The defense plays soft, gets no pressure and pretty boy throws for 300 yards, Beano Cook's head explodes live on ESPN and I go home and drink a gallon of Drain-O.

In reality, I don't see Purdue losing this game, but I don't see Purdue winning by 22. So I'll go with 31 - 17.

Anonymous said...

I'm not predicting a score because I have no clue how UND will play. I think that The Boy Wonder, with help from his parents, will throw his first touchdown. My hope, and I'm stretching here, is that the coaches let the defense run wild and call all sorts of blitzes. I don't care if UND gets 3 touchdowns off it, I want to see the defense blowing holes in their pathetic O-line. Hopefully UND hasn't been practicing the screen play all week.

J Money said...

Tim: After the nonsensical crap you said, you're going to proofread mine??

And yeah, I tripped over that as I wrote it, but I actually don't think I'm wrong. Clunky syntax, yes, but not sure it's wrong.

Besides, I write a lot here... I'm bound to be less than perfect at times. Though I know you expect perfection from me.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of the boy wonder, what is the over/under on the number of times we'll see his parents? 50? 100?

boilerdowd said...

Did you hear that his parents moved to South Bend? Is that true? If it is, I ask two questions- first, what's his Dad do for a living? Second, how gay is that? J, Tim, did your parents move to Lafayette to be with their little boys? They probably should have since you're both maroons, but they didn't.

Anonymous said...

Wow, that crushes me because when I went home for a weekend visit, I found out that my parents had moved and didn't tell me!

Now I think the over/under should be how long before Pretty Boy goes on a murder spree.

Anonymous said...

Wow - I know Purdue would go to sleep for a little while, but to have both the Offense and Defense just completely leave the stadium for most of the 2nd half?
I liked the blocked kick. Liked the run defense. But what the hell was with the second half. It was obviously Tiller's nap time or something. I think he should retire and start selling oatmeal.

Anonymous said...

酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,

,酒店