Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Sammy Sosa Outrage -- Go!

So Sammy Sosa is on the list of those who were caught cheating back when they knew they might get tested. Another victory for the player's union! Way to protect your guys!

But really, the saddest part is that nobody is surprised. And if you think Sammy was likable even back then, there are those who beg to differ.

And remember back in 2002 when Rick Reilly approached Sammy and tried to take him up on his offer that he'd be "the first one in line" to take drug tests if and when it ever came to pass? And how Sammy got all mad at Reilly? (Also, can someone explain to me how Reilly zeroing in on Sosa like this in 2002 was acceptable and yet when a blogger questions Raul Ibanez' whacko stats at age 37 in 2009 he's in the wrong? Shut up, Ken Rosenthal.)

Howard Bryant is one of many who has a sanctimonious column up today that's actually a good read, but still... come on, mainstream media. You've all been complicit in this and just as we all (kind of) agree that the whole era of baseball is tainted by PEDs, I'd have to argue that the whole era of sportswriting is tainted by a-holes like Mike Lupica sitting around lionizing guys who were obviously cheating. And yet they still write articles about how we've all been betrayed. Get off our side of the line, sportswriters -- you're over there with the players. You had access to locker rooms, you heard the whispers, etc. But you feared if you dared comment on it, you'd be expelled from the boy's club and your access would go away. And it probably would have. But that doesn't change the fact that mainstream media missed the boat -- COMPLETELY -- and probably hastened the success, power and acceptance of sports blogs. Chew on that.

And not to quote myself, but I am fairly awesome, as you know... but here's what I said in late 2007 about this topic:

"Unfortunately, I think we're all going to be talking about steroids and other illegal performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) for a while now ... And all the sanctimonious pricks like Mike Lupica who slurped at the altar of McGwire and Sosa back in '98 and then acted all shocked when it turned out they were doped up enough to kill a horse will write condemning articles about baseball players and the sanctity of the game."

So as it turns out, Sammy was a cheater, and he was a liar. When he was caught corking his bat, he quickly did both -- cheated with the cork and lied that it was his... batting practice bat? Seriously, and people sort of wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Add Sammy to the list of known cheaters. And if baseball had any sense, they'd somehow hasten the release of the remaining names on this not-so-anonymous list. I used to think they shouldn't be released because, hey, it was supposed to be anonymous. But that horse has left the barn. In fact, that horse has left the barn, crossed the pasture and his ass his rapidly disappearing over the horizon. Those names are going to come out, one way or another. Obviously, someone has access to them and they're going to be leaked at interesting times. I almost wonder if Sammy's remarks just two weeks ago about his wholesomeness pissed someone off who had the names. Point is, the names should be released, or we're just going to keep hearing about them. Let's just hear 'em all and move on. Oh, and who would shock you at this point? Jeter? Ichiro? Griffey?

In the end, this was a mess that baseball and mainstream media helped create. Everyone was complicit in this, including fans. However, fans questioned much, much more than those who had access questioned -- you just couldn't hear them because blogs weren't much in the late '90s and early '00s. So today we're left with really no way to fix things. Some clowns suggest you eradicate records from the record books. Hall of Fame voters -- yes, those same sportswriters who put Mac and Sosa on the cover of SI in togas -- will be pissy and not let in the current/next crop of suspected/confirmed cheaters. And then there are those who just chalk it up to an "era" and leave it at that. There's no good solution -- baseball is forever changed and not in a good way.

Thanks for "saving" the game, Sammy.

9 comments:

boilerdowd said...

I'd be more shocked if I could see a good player NOT on the list. Hey, it's your sport, J, Tim.

I will say this about Sammy- while his selective memory on how to speak English was silly, I got to see him play at Wrigley a few years ago...and it was pretty great. He played to the fans and ran onto the field like he was shot out of a cannon...The Cubs' faithful loved it and I can understand why. He has a big persona and helped the Cubs reach greatness...OK, that was really a shot at both the Cubs and Sosa, sorry I couldn't help myself.

But, he was entertaining, enhanced or not.

Purdue Matt said...

"I'd have to argue that the whole era of sportswriting is tainted by a-holes like Mike Lupica sitting around lionizing guys who were obviously cheating"

Very well said!

Purdue Matt said...

It still pisses me off how people like Peter Gammons defended players named in the Mitchell Report and attempted to tear down people like McNamee that were telling the truth.

J Money said...

To play devil's advocate just a little, McNamee was kind of trying to save his ass a bit, too.

boilerdowd said...

Ibanez, by the way, is just hitting his stride...I mean, you know J, as you get older, you just feel better and better, physically. Every morning I feel younger and more spry.

J Money said...

If I was rolling in the hay with your wife, I'm sure I'd feel spry, too.

HEY-YO!!

boilerdowd said...

I didn't even know Raul knew G. I gotta talk to her.

E said...

If Raul keeps it up, it is pretty suspect. However, when you look at his past you will see he has had very similar 50-60 game spans such as this.

When were steroid officially banned in baseball? If the players did them before this time, I don't think you can call them cheaters since everyone COULD do them. So they are just plain criminals, not cheaters.

I think it is still pretty scary that this list wasn't destroyed. Put yourself in the players shoes. They saw how Sammy and Mark were put on a pedestal and made millions, so they started juicing to keep up. It wasn't against the rules, so who cared? Now your union says to take a test that is TOTALLY secret and that there is no way your name will come out. Now these players have been totally betrayed.

J Money said...

E, for one of the rare times, you and I are in complete agreement (your last paragraph, anyway). That's what I meant with my first short paragraph. The players have their UNION to blame for this mess. The union had the chance to destroy the results and they DIDN'T. They actively decided NOT to. Worst misstep they could have made, considering their #1 priority is supposed to be looking out for the players.

As for it not being officially banned, well, that's kind of silly. You're right, and so I would say that we can't suspend or punish anyone for transgressions before they were officially banned... BUT, many of these guys were doing things illegal as per U.S. and state laws. I'd actually rather break MLB rules than have the DEA coming after me.