Monday, March 15, 2010

Quick Thoughts

I expressed this earlier, but yesterday's game took it out of me. So much that I haven't watched any basketball since. I worked on a home improvement project, watched the first Indy Car race of the year and enjoyed hanging out with my family. Didn't watch any of the selection shows...and haven't yet filled out a bracket. I refuse to watch EsPN right now...I already know what they're saying, so don't need to hear it.

Sidebar- to all of the talking heads at that network and elsewhere, I have a request- Don't waste your time talking about Purdue next year. As Purdue rolled along two separate double-digit winning streaks, you bag of sucks were constantly looking to kick Matty's club in the collective groin. When Hummel went down, you had your shot and you seized it...you got to remove Purdue from anything positive...from your crappy "Lead" headlines, to soundbites from shiny-fat-faced know-nothings doing nothing but discrediting Purdue at every opportunity...Thanks for the pub, but no thanks.

Next year and after, we don't need you, we don't want any favors or "love". F the rankings, the highlight shows and premature studies of imaginary brackets that are never close to right. Purdue wasn't sexy this season...nobody like Turner who stares into the crowd and poses after every noteworthy play (and turns the ball over 10 times/gm)...nobody like Wall who's as good of an athlete as anyone in the nation and whines and bitches at everyone in his path...Nobody who's one-and-done. That's not going to change. One of our stars looks like the neighbor's kid who's got a heart of gold, but doesn't look like an athlete. The second is quiet and too thin...not enough moxy for you guys. The third is a tweener by NBA standards (great league, by the way) and is way too calm...and doesn't have enough personality for prime time. We hear aOSU has another guy you'll love who's coming in...just keep your cameras in Columbus.

We're Purdue. These teams are built around defense...that's not fun to watch, turn away, tune out. Anybody else outside the Purdue family, this request is for you too. Hell, start right now- Ignore Purdue in the NCAA tourney...shouldn't be too difficult for you.
Alright, onto the tourney draw.
Purdue faces a very good team. Siena is a small (around 3,000 students) Catholic school in New York...but I can guarantee you the neutral crowd will be pulling for the lower-seeded Saints.

Siena is 30th in the nation, according to realtimerpi. They have a four players that average 13 or more points/game. Nine of their players average 10 or more minutes of playing time a game. They average more steals/gm than Purdue and are an athletic, fast and strong team...but they're not tall. Their biggest player is 6'9" 225...but he plays taller- He'll give JJ trouble as he is aggressive on the glass as well.

Both Purdue and Siena played St. Joseph's- Purdue won 85-60, Siena won 92-75. Purdue played them at the end of November, Siena at the end of December.

They don't really have a signature win...in fact, their biggest win was against Northeastern, a team in the 70s, according to rpi and Pomeroy. You might have seen them lose to Butler in the bracket buster a month ago...they played Butler well for 30 minutes, but ended up losing by 17 at Hinkle. But, they're tournament-tested. Last year, they beat aOSU in the opening round of the tourney and they won their first round tourney game the year before. At the same time, Purdue has won 11-straight first round tourney games...something's gotta give.

Siena's team leaders are Seniors and Juniors- they remember the tourney success. But, they lost a key cog after last year's victory over aOSU. One of Siena's players (Clarence Jackson) is dinged up a la LewJack...gametime decision.

I've nosed around some message boards and read some comments from different outlets and Siena's fanbase is already looking ahead to, not the round of 32, but sweet 16. Sounds like Seth Davis and others have helped boost the Saints' confidence. Let's hope their players and coaches take Purdue just as lightly...but that's doubtful.

More to come as the week progresses.

12 comments:

John said...

That rant was brilliant. Gave me goosebumps.

I love being a Boiler.

zlionsfan said...

Other things to note: they don't turn the ball over, they rebound surprisingly well despite their height (getting over 70% of the rebounds on their defensive end), and they really, really don't foul. Fouls per 40 minutes among their starters: 1.7, 1.7, 2.7, 2.9, 3.1.

Good news: they do not shoot many threes, and what they do shoot is usually off-target. Only three players took 70 or more threes: Ubiles (39.4%), Jackson (35.7%), and Moore (23.0%). That should fit nicely with Purdue's weakness on defense behind the arc. They're not deep, either: about 80% of the minutes come from the starters. That's not quite Ohio State territory, but it's not far from it, either. If somehow Purdue can get a guy in foul trouble, that could be a good thing.

Anything is possible this week. Hey, maybe Digger Phelps will pick Siena to go to the Elite Eight and we can all laugh when he's wrong. (Of course I'm joking. Digger would never pick a team seeded below a 2 to make the Elite Eight. That would require thought and analysis.)

I'm glad we're not in Butler's bracket. That's not a game we need to see right now.

Go Boilers!

rhiles2760 said...

At least, we're not playing on back to back days any more, and from what their local paper was saying their Jackson is out for the first weekend. We just need to pressure the ball like we usually do, which they aren't used to seeing. And offensively, take our shots when we have them, and hit the boards, but still maintain defensive floor balance.

CalTravelGuy said...

I'm so sick of the Purdue hate on CBS and ESPN, HOWEVER, we are Purdue and you just can't make a case for us being a decent team if we can't beat the likes of Siena and Texas A&M to reach the Sweet 16. I'll be sickened if we aren't here next weekend talking about our Sweet Sixteen match up. The choice is ours. It's time to shut up and play.

Purdue Matt said...

I love the sidebar.

Purdue Matt said...

"I'm glad we're not in Butler's bracket. That's not a game we need to see right now."

I was thinking the same thing during the selection show. Don't want to face Butler or Notre Dame without Hummel on the floor.

MattDSM said...

Is that nun giving us the finger?

Mark said...

Don't get me wrong, I'm an avid Purdue fan, but we'll always be the red headed step child with acne until we actually win big games in the tournament.

If you want respect, you have to earn it. Once again, Purdue's hopes are dashed in late Feb. March.

This is why everyone discredits Purdue...it's an oft' repeating story of "almost."

And so we repeat the line of the Cubbies..."Next year..."

PWS said...

I'm with you, Boilerdowd. This is usually my favorite time of year, but my heart has simply been ripped out of my chest.

mmmookie said...

i also love the rant... i feel it.

if i wasn't a Purdue fan i'd likely pick Sienna too.

But Painter is a good tourney coach. And i don't think our half of the south bracket is tough... elite 8 is a good possibility.

Still it makes you think what if Hummel didn't get hurt... or at the very least, what if Martin never transferred...

Joe said...

Martin tore his ACL before this season even started. He's worthless.

JonS said...

That picture is awesome!