If you follow us, you probably know we don't like off-season drama. From the NFLPA negotiating a deal to players taking too long to decide whether they should stay in college or leave for the league, this stuff is what we hate about sports.
We love the emotion within the game, the build-up before a game, of course the struggle within the contest and even the adjustments and quest for something greater during the season...but what we're in the middle of right now stinks...for everybody. That said, it's bound to happen.
Izzo was wooed by the NBA...and in our opinion, he handled that poorly by not making his decision in a timely manner. The result of his weeks of waffling might be what we saw this season- a team that was disjointed and results that really made no sense- MSU struggling game-in, game-out versus less-capable teams and an overall mediocre result. Sure, guys got injured, players flaked for one reason or another, but that team wasn't at all what we expect from Izzo and Sparty.
Billy Donovan's Florida squad won back-to-back national titles and then decided to move on to the NBA...only to apologize and come back to Florida. The fallout of his waffling was three seasons of teams that weren't even close to being contenders.
To a lesser degree, Thad Matta coached Xavier to very successful seasons, his final ended in the round of eight in the NCAA tourney. After all but promising his return to X, Matta moved onto greener pastures in Columbus. Everything worked out well for all parties involved in the end- Xavier got Miller, aOSU got a guy willing to play ball the way the Buckeye athletic department likes to do things...but a lot of Xavier fans still see red when they see Matta as they believe he handled it poorly.
Brad Stevens, who I officially have a mancrush on, knocked down interest from Oregon and ACC programs by simply staying put and taking what Butler was willing to pay...no where near what he would have gotten elsewhere, but I think Stevens thought himself a good fit for that athletic department. Keep in mind, he's a Depauw grad, not a Butler grad. But Butler allowed him to move up quickly (7 years) from unpaid assistant coach to 80+% winning Head Coach. Who knows what this off-season holds...but I guarantee sizable satchels of greenbacks will be hurled in Stevens general direction until he makes it stop...yet again.
When you make runs at national championships, win with consistency, and turn around programs, people notice...and coaches get massive offers to coach at the next level or get offers to up their salaries and prestige while taking the elusive next step in their careers. And there is absolutely a right and wrong way for these off-season issues to be handled.
The problem of handling this issue isn't that of the schools or entities doing the wooing, it's the job of the current employee and employer's to throw water on the embers of rumors. So where does Purdue & Painter stand right now?
Well, as of this point, there's really no damage that's been done. Since all of these rumors arose, Painter spent a deserved vacation with a 7 foot tall mouse and his wife and kids. The rumors have turned into official interest as Mizzou has pretty much said it only has eyes for Matty publicly proclaiming that they only have officially contacted one coach.
To make matters scarier, leaks from Mizzou's athletic department say they're expecting to announce their new head coach either Tuesday or Wednesday. That's either brazen or foolish, depending on the outcome. But before we connect the dots that are lined up, let's look at a few things.
First, this is the same Missouri athletic department that showed all of his cards and its interest in the BT months ago when rumors were swirling about what was coming next from Delany and company. Mizzou was left with its foot in its mouth and a weak B12 affiliation when the music stopped. Who knows how the feelings were reciprocated by the BT's office, but we know Missouri wears its heart on its sleeve and isn't the most politically-savvy organization in the world...but who can blame them in either case for wanting to be out of the B12 or wanting Matty as their head coach? Nobody. But, their tact might be even more in question if this most recent chapter doesn't work out in their favor.
Let's now shift our gaze to Purdue's athletic department and specifically, Morgan Burke. As these rumors have gained heat and speed, we haven't heard a public peep from Burke and co. I don't know why it would hurt them to just come out and say, "We're doing everything to insure Painter will be back at Purdue next year." Whatever that means, I think it might ease some of the angst among the Purdue faithful...but that's not Burke and his department's style. They run things quietly and pretty old fashioned. Most recently, when the Barlow issue arose, nothing was ever officially released from the department or the two most-important people involved in the decision (Burke/Painter). Instead, they handled it internally...and maybe that's what's happening now. (I do understand that these are different issues, by the way.)
Matt Painter is not Tom Crean. He doesn't tweet, he doesn't high five fans, heck, he doesn't even get excited as officials are reaming his players (time and time again). So Coach Painter not publicly responding makes sense. And really, his response might make more sense than anyone's in this situation. He's on vacation, it's not time to address the media. He and his staff are underpaid, so letting these rumors catch fire only helps him in any potential negotiations. And honestly, he doesn't owe anyone anything at this point. While he's the face of Purdue basketball, his position is not as much of a PR post as is Burke's or Alden's.
The layers of responsibility should go like this, if you're a Purdue fan: Burke needs to keep Painter in West Lafayette by offering him his fair market value and giving his staff the same. Burke defended himself as recently as late Fall saying that Purdue pays coaches what they deserve to be paid and what they've earned. By that admission, since Painter's teams haven't finished outside the top-2 in the league in the last four years, and ticket sales show it, he probably should be paid, at minimum, as a top-4 coach in the league...not eighth. If someone wants to throw an unusually-high amount of money at Painter (say $2.5million +) and Burke doesn't think that's his market value, so be it. But he'd better be willing to get an equally-established coach to do the job in that case, not a cheap option, to continue the basketball program's momentum.
The next layer of responsibility should be Painter's. When he was hired at Purdue, he had a very thin resume...but was given a good (albeit odd) job to follow Keady. So he should feel some sense of loyalty to Purdue. That loyalty, in my opinion, means giving Purdue the chance to keep him and make a push for him. He doesn't really owe Purdue the luxury of underpaying him. He doesn't owe them the right to not give him a fair market dollar amount to spend on his coaches and support staff. If Purdue can't, or worse, refuses to, come to the table with competitive compensation and terms, they only have themselves to blame.
Painter and Cuonzo Martin's agent Buddy Baker seem to have all the cards right now...and we as fans/alums really know nothing. Baker knew enough to direct Martin toward the NCAA sanction-laden program of Tennessee instead of waiting for this whole situation to work itself out. We'll know in the coming week what that actually means...as of now, we're all just guessing what is coming next.
But, as soon as we hear something concrete, I can guarantee you that we will post our reaction.
24 comments:
Appreciate the way you wrote this piece B-dowd. Very reasonable and very logical. Totally agreed with you saying that at the least Burke should have released a statement saying we're doing our best to keep Matt here. That would be nice.
I agree with you 99%. Burke, is very old school in his actions, but his hands are a bit tied by the school's administratioin. I think it would be good for his department to make an announcement, but he may not feel like he can if the president and board haven't told him he can offer Painter more money right now.
That said, I always think Burke could do a better job, and that maybe, just maybe, some new blood in at AD may soon be needed.
Oh, and good for Cuonzo! He's going to have a rough few years at TN, but I think he'll do a great job there.
First reasonable thing I've read all day on this. I don't think he is leaving, not for MO anyway. But I do wish they would get it done, one way or another. Obsessively checking Twitter and FB for news is killing my productivity today.
What does this say about Purdue that this has even been allowed to get this far? This by all accounts should be a lifetime job for an alum that was handpicked by his predecessor. I know sports are after all just sports, but Purdue operates like a mid major in a power conference. No wonder our sports are so lackluster from year to year.
Can we all just agree that we need a serious readjustment in the AD's office? I mean first of all, I think we lucked out with Painter. He has surpassed all expectations for a coach following a ledgend. I don't know if alot of coaches that would agree to the bizzare one year apprenticeship we put Matt through. For some reason Burke decided to follow the apprentice model and let Tiller chose his replacement. Fail. France needs to fire Burke.
GBI has article saying that Painter is going to meet with Mizzou officials. Not looking good.
If somebody offered you a 33% raise, you'd listen right? You'd probably even meet with them.
I'll grant that coaching a college basketball team is not just a job, and the coach does have some responsibility to consider the kids he recruited, and even the fans that pay his salary. It's hard for me to believe Painter will go to MO over a 33% raise that won't really change his standard of living. Not when he has employment for life at Purdue, and borderline god-like status. If he really wants out of Purdue for some reason he can get a much better job than MO.
But then, maybe it is all about the benjamins here. We'll know soon enough.
I'm the meantime, practice saying Coach Darner ;)
Very well said Dowd.
Wouldn't Mizzou be a step down? I don't get him going there.
Somewhere else....absolutely.
Mizzou is a 100% lateral move. Okay, maybe just a minor step down from a tradition/fan base standpoint. The two school are actually very similar until the last few years.
The only real reason to take the job would be money.
Recruiting is going to take a pretty big hit unless we retain MP. Seems like the only mitigation possible, would be to promote Lusk. Or, get Stevens. I really doubt they could afford or get Stevens interested.
I fully expect that Crean, Matta, and the rest are ready to pounce on the opportunity. Ugh!
Great subject and post, my friend.
I have mixed feelings on this.
Clearly Baker holds the most power in this whole ordeal and the lack of public discourse only works to his advantage. Burke can say something, but the window for that has passed. It's a Catch-22 for Burke at this point in time, which leads me to believe that this is a way to show that Painter is a valued commodity outside of Indiana and needs to be compensated for such value.
The Boilermaker in me says that had Matt seriously considered leaving, word would have gotten to Zo. I sincerely believe that CMP wants what is best for Purdue. Do not tell me the two have not been talking at least through Baker. We're all Boilers. It's a special bond to our alma mater, admit it. That cannot be discounted.
However, the businessman in me sees how all this beckons to Baker doing what an agent does which is get the highest value for your client's services. This has not been done unethically. No rules have been broken. No mud has been slung in public. Let's face it; alot of these situations in high-profile sports rarely refrain from getting dirty laundry tossed out into the public street. We can count our blessings there that all sides have remained classy and professional, (fans and die-hards aside).
College coaches are more popular than almost all public-appointed officials and are held in high esteem. The media publicity this has generated only fuels the fire for Baker and Painter to hold leverage over Burke and Purdue; for better or worse. Burke knows he has other variables to consider such as a Mackey Project that needs cheeks in the seats to keep in the black, a football program headed south, and a rabid basketball fan base that will merely heap coals on his head if Matt is allowed to wander off.
Let's not confuse Burke's frugality with being "cheap." Sure, some of his decisions make little/no sense on the surface, (i.e., stadium lights, anyone?), but he also has limited funds to work with, is in the black, and knows how to glad-hand with the right folks.
All that being considered, I strongly believe Painter will stay and Burke will reach a deal with his coach. If he does not stay and we are forced to search for another b-ball coach, it will say more about the athletic and university administrations than what can be said about Painter and Baker.
Just my two pennies.
Crap! Sorry, guys. I posted with my wife's account. This is jfiandt, (above under Leah).
So I'll just say....what "she" said. Word.
BOILER UP!!
Painter's not worth losing every year when it really matters. That being said, he's not worth much at all. I think Lavin's probably our only hope.
I just heard the deal is done and he is gone. Ugh. I feel sick.
Conflicting reports as of now. Rabjohns says he hasn't agreed to the terms; which means he is awaiting a counter-offer most likely.
Rally for Coach Painter tomorrow at noon on Memorial Mall.
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=173707916014451
I know I'm stepping out here, but forgive me for not drinking the Keady kool-aid. Yes, he did bring banners to Purdue, but also had MAJOR sanctions and violations coupled with unethical behavior...
NOT to mention he was 12 games under .500 in conference play over the last decade of his career at Purdue.
NOT to mention his name is still on the court but he is employed by another university. How would it play out if St Johns and Purdue played in the tournament?
My loyalty goes with Purdue.
Also, Morgan Burke is a no talent assclown.
Also, Kelsey Barlow owes Donnie Hale an apology to his face.
Ben, your assessment of the NCAA violations regarding Luther Clay in the 90's is not accurate. Keady had no personal involvement and was not cited in the NCAA report. So what unethical behavior are you talking about? You mean suspending players for missing class (Woody Austin)?
If you want some stats on Keady: 2nd all time in Big Ten victories, Big Ten COY 7 times, National COY 6 times, 18 NCAA Tournament apperances, and the only Big Ten coach to have a winning record vs. Bob Knight. That also doesnt count all of his accomplishments with USA basketball.
Boxer,
Maybe I could have been a better wordsmith here...but these violations DID occur on Keady's watch, with MJB as AD, regardless how you slice it.
http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/node/17382
And yes, your stats on Keady are correct- as are mine.
I remain undeterred in my opinion. Yes he coached the good guys for 25 years...maybe 10 years too many. He never won a national championship or had a Final Four appearance for that matter.
Matt Painter has COY honors...3 in the last 4 years. He's cut Gene's total in half in 6 years in what took Gene 25.
Also, please don't wake the lion regarding Purdue alum from Richmond, Indiana- my place of birth. I won't play nicely. :)
I hate to do a shameless facebook plug, but I think this is a really good idea, albeit there is probably a ton of red tape to actually make it happen. There is a group started titled "I'd Pitch in $100 to Keep Painter (20000+ Ready to BTFU)". Show your support!
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_109657269116297¬if_t=group_added_to_group#!/home.php?sk=group_109657269116297&ap=1
Post a Comment