Saturday, March 05, 2011

Hardworking Hawkeyes Humble Boilers 67-65

Painful.

It was Senior Day at Carver Hawkeye Arena and only one player was honored, but he played inspired...and so did the rest of his team. Jarryd Cole has played well against the Boilers in the past- he did so last season, but this was his best game versus our Boilers. He finished with a team-leading 16 points and 10 rebounds. The Hawkeyes seemingly wanted to send Cole out in style...and they did by giving the beleaguered Hawkeye fans a reason to cheer in a rebuilding season.

All season, we had given Coach Fran and the Hawkeyes a ton of credit for being better than their record...sadly, we saw proof of their improvement at the worst-possible time.

On the 50/50 plays, Iowa won almost all of them. If the Hawkeyes needed a rebound...they got it. Fran's squad played like they were the ones looking to cinch up a high seed and close locale for the NCAA tourney...and their opponent acted as if grit and guts were optional on this Saturday evening.

Purdue's effort was atrocious. Its defense was uninspired and the effort on the glass was lax at best. Just as we ask for our favorite team to get credit when they hold a team down and force them into a game they don't want to play, Iowa deserves the credit. They made Purdue look un-Purdue like...and the fellas in the black uniforms better not miss this: Purdue is not talented enough top to bottom to not play as a cohesive unit.

Matty's boys pride themselves on being a team that has someone step up each contest in unexpected ways...there was none of that today. In fact, even the guys you expect big things from wilted and disappeared.

You look at the stats and might say, "No one was helping Jackson and Johnson." But the truth is everyone on Purdue failed at some point in this contest.

With over 13 minutes left, JJ had 20 points...he ended with 22. The shots that are typically-automatic for him weren't falling. His 12 boards and 2 blocks were good, but down the stretch with Purdue needed to grab one of Iowa's missed shots, he couldn't come up with the ball. Plus, the help defense that Purdue seems to funnel toward Johnson seemed to fail on the backside quite a few times in the game.

I liked what I saw from Jackson at times today. But, it was clear that the hand injury knocked him down a rung, at least for a portion of the second half. He didn't push the ball, which is critical in this system and Purdue got very few easy run outs. He finished with 13pts, 4reb, 4ast, 4stls, but it wasn't enough.

Byrd, Smith, TJohn, Hart and Moore finished 5-of-23 from behind the arc. It seemed that after Jackson, no one was willing to shoot anything inside of 20ft. 9in. But why? Once again, it was a lazy looking offense. In fact, with just over a minute left and Purdue down by 2, Purdue missed two threes, got both rebounds and looked like they were going to shoot another three...so Painter signaled for a timeout. After the timeout, Byrd shot and missed a 24 footer...I'm hoping Matty didn't draw that up.

Moore was on the bench for a long stretch (around 10:00) in the first half due to foul trouble, but he didn't do a whole bunch outside of his 13 points when given the opportunity. His usual ability to make his teammates better through rebounding and dealing the ball simply wasn't there as he finished with 1 board, 1 assist and 1 steal.

Barlow wasn't in sync either- he finished with 4 points, shot 2/5 from the stripe, had 2 turnovers, 0 assists and 3 fouls in his 14 minutes of action.

And Barlow wasn't the only one to struggle at the free throw line. Purdue shot an uncharacteristic 58.8% from the line and left at least 7 points on the floor. So even while getting whipped on the glass (47-32) and not coming up with hustle plays, they still could have won had they hit their free throws.

Purdue got exactly what it deserved in Iowa City: A loss. But now, the fallout and ramifications of this loss will probably be pretty severe. Judging by what we've seen the past few years, people will more than likely remember this game, not the 7 wins in a row that led up to it. This upset was the front story on EsPN.com, and rightfully so...and it'll probably be at the forefront of the tourney committee's minds a week from today unless Purdue does something to erase the memory.

On Twitter people were asking if this loss is an important, and possibly-positive moment, for this team. We don't know that, and really, we can't say what it is in the long view for weeks. After the game JJ reiterated this point by saying,
"A lot of people will say it's a bad loss, but it's a matter of how we respond to it to see if we can turn it into a good loss."
But, right now, it stinks. Painter often says that teams don't play "on edge" enough as their winning...and that definitely was the case today. Everyone from the coaches to the players did not take the Hawkeyes seriously and because of that, Purdue's standing the college basketball world is now much different than it was this morning. Hopefully they regain the chip on their collective shoulder that made them great in the month of February.

13 comments:

Erin said...

I think we are all speechless...

Ben said...

Just to put a TINY bit of perspective on it, Iowa playing at home only lost to aOSU by 5 and also took Wisconsin into overtime before losing to them. A loss is still a loss, no excuse, but hopefully this is just the kick in the ass these guys needed to not get too comfortable in the tournaments.

Mommatried said...

They played awful. No intensity. No in your face defense. No sense of urgency. 6 losses may as well be 25 losses if you play that poorly. 5-25 from 3? 25-69 from the field? Just embarrassing.

If you can't make more than 25 field goals in 40 minutes you should be contracted from the league.

Yes, I am a bit wound. Yes, I'm madder than a midget with a yoyo. Thanks for spoiling my Saturday. I guess I should jump in the boat with Morgan Burke and lower my expectations.

boilerdowd said...

Erin- I hit the enter key too quickly...sorry about that.

Unknown said...

So Purdue is guaranteed a win just because they step on the floor?As Bert Bell said on any given Sunday any team can beat any other team and this is true in all sports.A unranked team has a chance of upsetting a ranked team.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Matt Shobe said...

No excuse can cover for losing today. None. No such thing as a good loss in March – especially not after reeling off seven straight. Bye-bye #1 seed, bye-bye B10/NCAA tourney momentum, and (far less important, but still) I think this shelves any possible Coach of the Year honors for Painter. They can absolutely go ahead and surprise me any time – but I am beyond sick and tired of the teams I care about collapsing at precisely the wrong, spotlit moments.

SJD said...

Matt, it's frustrating, but my perspective is this:

I'd take this letdown loss over losing to Illinois, MSU or IU on the road- those were very important, for different reasons, obviously.

But, many of the individual post-season award evaporated when the clock hit 0:00 in Iowa City today...that might be poetic a bit- this team is based on doing things well together.

Matt Shobe said...

Spot-on, Ryan – they'll live and die as a team. Sounds like LewJack's hand and Moore's flu symptoms couldn't have helped matters. The best part about the winning streak (really, the season so far) was that production and poise came from different numbers on the roster nearly every night. Nowhere to hide and make it someone else's problem on that bench. Let's just hope this game strongly reminded them of that. (I imagine Painter will bring it up once or twice next week.)

Anonymous said...

We need JJ to stay in the paint and rebound, what we saw yesterday was exactly why this needs to happen. Sure its great when he's dropping bombs from way outside the paint, but when he shoots from out there and misses.....who rebounds???

dozer8589 said...

As much as this Iowa loss stings, it may not be a bad thing. Purdue historically doesn't handle success well, and underperforms in the role of the favorite.

But when they are the over-looked underdog, they are really very good. I like the idea of this team going into the tournament as a three-seed with something to prove...

Andrew said...

It is hard for me to truly believe that this loss will have positive results. I am trying to tell myself what all Purdue fans are trying to tell themselves: this was a wake up call before the tournament. But in reality I don't think we needed a wake up call. I can't see a scenario where our boys would not be ready to play in the BTT or NCAA. In truth this loss is what it appears to be. A crappy loss to a crappy team which probably was a result of looking ahead to the upcoming tournament season. As of right now it will have no affect in regards to the Big Ten as UW is losing to OSU. Hopefully it does not affect our NCAA seeding or the boys' confidence. Instead of being a wake up call, my hope is that it will put the chip back on our shoulder that may have been lost with all of the recent success and praise.

In regards to the game specifically, I am scratching my head like everyone else. The most frustrating part is all the threes we took late in the game when we were only down 4 or 2. There were multiple times late in the game where we could have driven and instead settled for a long three. It almost seemed like the players didn't want to settle for just the win but wanted to destroy Iowa the way most people thought they would. Unfortunately as the game got later and this outcome began to slip away we continued to try to shoot our way to a 15 point victory instead of grinding out a 2 point win.

zlionsfan said...

Iowa deserves credit for playing a solid game. It's a shame, because this was almost a really, really good regular season: of the five previous losses, four were on the road to solid teams (Minnesota was actually pretty good prior to Nolen's injury), and the fifth was a neutral-court loss to a mid-major that's actually played fairly well.

Of course it's still a great season, just not what it could have been. A loss to a 150+ RPI moves hopes of a #1 seed from "maybe even with a BTT final loss" to "maybe not even with a BTT championship". Iowa's solidly in that group, and they could be Purdue's quarterfinal matchup, so we can't root for them to get farther to help us out.

On the other hand, there is still hope. According to ESPN, there are 8 teams ahead of Purdue, and they only need to pass 5 for a top seed (assuming it falls out roughly along RPI lines). Fortunately, there are three pairs of conference opponents ahead of the Boilers: BYU/SDSU, Duke/UNC, and Pitt/Notre Dame. So at least three of those teams will drop another game next week.

Kansas is a lock at this point, even if they lose their conference quarterfinal. OSU is probably a lock given the lack of quality behind them. BYU likely won't win the MWC, and I don't know that the committee will seed them lower to reflect the change after the suspension of Davies (although they should, I think).

I guess that means we root for upsets in the Mountain West, ACC, and Big East. Of course RPIs will move based on all results, so Purdue's RPI will be affected by all BTT games (and then some), but Duke losing to, say, NC State or Maryland will hurt them more than losing again to UNC would.

And we should root for Richmond to run the table in the A-10 ... they could end up in the 1-50 box and make that loss look a bit better.