Thursday, March 01, 2007

Hubert Davis Explains Boilers Chances

Now, on Monday night, Digger said the Boilers weren't in. Then Tuesday night, Digger said they would get in. Then tonight on Sportscenter when they were breaking it down, whoever the analyst on SC was said that Purdue had two bad losses, to Minnesota and to Indiana State.


That brings us to tonight, after Purdue beat down Minnesota to move to 19-10 on the season and 8-7 in the Big Ten. This evening on whatever that ESPN college hoops show is called, Hubert Davis was asked about Purdue's chances of making the Tournament. And he's squarely in the middle, saying the Boilers need to win their last game (against Northwestern) and then "make some noise" in the Big Ten tournament. Of course, it doesn't help Purdue's case that they're having games disappear from the record. The below graphic was shown during Hubert's analysis:



Only "one win on their opponents' home floor"? Wait, did the February 3 win at Penn State not count? I mean, I realize it was Penn State but it still counts as a road win, right? I mean, I realize the Boilers don't have many road wins this year but don't take away half the win total, Hubert. Do a smidge of research before going on the air. Thanks.

5 comments:

Purdue Matt said...

They also took wins off of Purdue's schedule as well. It turns out we imagined those wins over DePaul, Missouri, Oklahoma, & Virginia.

When they showed quality wins, they only showed MSU, Illinois, & IU.

Ross McLochness said...

I also love that yesterday we were off the board at ESPN and up to a 9 seed at CBS.Sportsline.com

J Money said...

It's all more evidence that "Bracketology" is a complete and utter waste of time. ESPECIALLY considering that this stuff starts being batted about months before the season ends... How can you be seeding teams in January? So stupid.

boilerdowd said...

J- my older brother told me that Lenardi had Purdue out last night, but in this morning...I guess that late-night win over some imaginary team helped out quite a bit. Whatever.

Anonymous said...

酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,

,酒店