Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Purdue Beats MSU (Eyewitness Account)
My sister-in-law was kind enough to forfeit a chance to see her alma mater play so my brother, Dad, and my friend got to see Purdue play MSU this evening. These aren't OK seats...they're stupid-good seats. Section 18, Row 15...sure, the seats in Mackey are waaaaaaay too narrow, but that didn't bother us. We were in the best venue (because of tremendous sight lines) in college basketball with a bunch of people who are bringing back the thunder from Mackey circa 1990-something. So what did I see that couldn't be seen on TV? Quite a bit, I think.
First off, I got to see just how hard Chris Kramer plays all of the time. He had the unenviable task of chasing Drew Neitzel around the court for 40 minutes. Neitzel's good...just not great v. Purdue. Tonight, it wasn't because Drew was off, it was because Kramer was in his jersey for the entire contest. I understand why Kramer is tired on offense so often (he was that way v. Wisconsin too)...he's just constantly working on defense.
There was a 7-10 minute period in which Purdue watched a 16-point lead melt down to three...so why did that happen? Well, they looked tired, as a team...and even emotionless...something very unusual for this team. I honestly think they might have simply worn themselves out with the highly-emotional win v. Wisky followed by a similar first half v. the Spartans. But, instead of folding when really being pushed by a very good MSU team, they showed a ton of grit and fortitude and found enough toughness to distance themselves from the scrappy and highly-ranked Spartan squad.
I figure it's better to bitch about officiating after a win than a loss, so here goes. While 2/3s of the officiating crew was pretty good tonight, the third guy was an abomination. He simply wouldn't make calls, no matter how obvious in nature the violation. He missed travels, reach-ins, over-the-backs, hooks, holds, clear-outs and others. I hope he doesn't get paid much, because he didn't deserve a nickel.
Robbie Hummel is smart, fundamentally sound and very talented. ESPN can show you highlights, but what you might not catch is that during a seven-minute period, he was simply dog tired. I kept pleading with Painter to give him just a 30-second rest, but he denied me over and over. As a result, Hummel was visibly gassed. But, when the game got down to the narrowest of magins, Purdue really needed a bucket. Robbie Hummel concentrated on getting open, set his feet, relied on his fundamentals and drained a three. His performance was unlike any Purdue star performance I've seen simply because of the fact that he dominated on the glass, on the offensive end and defensively during more than one stretch of the game. Lewis, Robinson, the Austin brothers, and others dominate on offense...Lowe, Sheffler, Stevens and others took games over defensively...Hummel does it either way. And his will is monstrously strong.
While Terry Hutchens didn't buy into Hummel as an impact player, and won't admit it, I will. I was sure he would be a solid role player that would be very good by the time he was a Junior or Senior. He is ahead of schedule...and can get much, much better. And, I was wrong about him...But I wasn't about Moore- he's pretty good too.
Moore is a very good player, but will get much better as he gets stronger. As he is able to create space with a stronger frame, he'll be able to rely on the drive when his stroke's not working.
Calasan needs to hit that baby hook...And Purdue needs him to do so as well. His feet are great and he's very good at getting in the right position and getting the ball. But, he simply doesn't shoot at a high-enough percentage when on the blocks. That said, he wears out defenders because he's active and forces them to guard him on the perimeter.
So what does tonight's win mean?
-It means that Purdue is in full control of its future. Will they add to the case of Big Ten Championship trophies that used to be a normal occurrence? Maybe, but there's a lot of work left to do. They play the best team in the Big Ten on Tuesday and have a bunch of other tough games before the BT tourney.
-As much as I'd like them to be, they're no longer under the radar. The national media is buying in...so Painter has a whole new set of problems to solve. I'm confident he can keep their heads screwed on straight...but I'm a bit skeptical of how Crump & Calasan will handle success.
-Matt Painter simply must be a finalist for the Nation COY
-Hummel, with an "OK" game v. Northwestern, will become POW for the second week in the row. Honestly, I understand why one Wisconsin paper said Kramer was the player of the game last Saturday...It could be argued that he deserved such an honor this evening. But that's like giving the Super Bowl MVP to an o-linemen...Hey, somebody's gotta do it and Kramer is probably the best defensive player in the Big Ten.
Next up, Northwestern at the house of purple. Remember Boilers, the IU game isn't worth nearly as much if you don't handle your business in Evanston.
Don't read the internet or papers this week, read your books, study hard and practice hard...Coach Painter will let you know what you need to hear.
This will go on the shelf with
Big Ten leading Boilers,
Purdue beats #9 MSU
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Robbie Hummel played 37 minutes last night, according to the boxscore. So, Painter did rest him--for a grand total of three minutes. Nonetheless, I see your point, although I didn't see much of the second half, since I was in class. Oh well. 360 to the rescue! (Yes, I'm one of the lucky ones with a participating ISP, and they changed the formatting and coding so that nobody can post a Media Player link. Which sucks.)
Oh, and this is unrelated, but I think you should read some of the comments here on the apparent CART-IRL merger, since we were discussing it earlier. Granted, these guys are Canadian, so they tend to agree with me a bit more on this issue, but for the most part, you are spot on with your observations. You do a new post on this and I will be the first to comment (perhaps; remember, I am in grad school). The comments are under "Your Call."
--Eric
I was at the game too. What an atmosphere!
Good post! Well said about Hummel. I loved how Kramer ripped away that rebound in the closing minutes.
Eric,
I'll check out the link in a bit after I get some work done. I'm not done covering/weighing in on the American open wheel soap opera...
Matt,
Kramer's rebound was sheer will and showed a bit of his attitude. Where were you sitting?
Sitting in the upper level. Not great seats, but better than nothing. Next year I will probably buy season tix through JPC.
Watching the game on TV one could see they were just standing around a lot to open the second half. But one could also see why they have won all of those games. They didn't crumple, they talked to one another, they kept playing defense. They live by the 3 and may die by the 3 someday, but they did finally start stepping inside and that's when the shots started falling.
Dowd - how well could you see Izzo? The first 10 minutes of the game I thought his head was going to pop. He has always had the whiny face, but hew as really working it. Then he calmed down and really started coaching. Besides Purdue being tired the second half, Izzo adjusted and his players responded. When he and Painter shook hands after the game, they talked for a moment too. You could tell that they really respected one another. I was all ready to really rip Izzo for being a jerk in the first half, but my attitude changed by the end of the game. I still think he is whiny, but I'll let it pass.
I could see him and couldn't believe how red his face looked at times. I have always thought he had a large head; I think I now know it's simply because of all of the built up pressure.
He's a good coach, but he's a tremendous hot head. Cant' say I'd be different.
Izzo is definitely one of the good guys.
Good call, Paul -- Izzo smiled at Painter as he talked and even gave him the hand on the side of the face "Good work, sonny" kind of approval. I thought it was really genuine and kind. I've always kind of liked Izzo, despite his hot-headedness. It doesn't ever seem to turn Knight-ish.
Just when I thought Izzo was going to get a tech (or two) he sat down and then calmed down. He would yell at the guys on the floor and at the refs (they missed a few big fouls and then called a few make-ups, so I can't blame him too much). He never yelled at the guys coming off the floor though. That's the big difference between hot-heads and Knight-heads.
Post a Comment